Score a proposed change to Bitcoin’s consensus rules against a published 20-criterion readiness standard. From Consensus Change Standards by Asaf Fulks (4th ed. 2026), §5.1. Mark each criterion, and the classification updates live.
Load a reference scoring:
▲Red
0 / 20 applicable criteria met (0%)
A 0/5 · B 0/5 · C 0/5 · D 0/5
Not ready — see §5.2 for the economic-node response.
What this measures. Readiness against a published standard — nothing more. A completed scorecard records one evaluator’s reading; it binds no one, mandates nothing, and confers no authority to block a change. Each node operator decides independently whether to run any consensus change (§6.7); a score’s only force is the strength of the reasons it documents (§5.3). Two narrow classes are excluded from the denominator (§5.2): temporal (criteria 19–20, for proposals that activated before any published standard existed) and structural (criterion 12 applies only where a UASF mechanism is used; criterion 11 only where a miner-signaling threshold is used). Publish scoring choices with their evidentiary basis — the framework asks that evaluations be legible and challengeable, not algorithmic.